Buy on Amazon
€56.8
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $55
Availability
MSRP in USD: $55
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Athlon 200GE outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Athlon 200GE is 2521 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 200GE
- Performs up to 1% better in Monster Hunter: World than FX-8150 - 252 vs 250 FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Up to 9% cheaper than Athlon 200GE - $46.81 vs $51.17
- Up to 9% better value when playing Monster Hunter: World than Athlon 200GE - $0.21 vs $0.23 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 200GE - 8 vs 4 threads
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
AMD YD200GC6FBBOX Athlon 200GE 2-Core 4-Thread AM4 Socket Desktop Processor with Radeon Vega Graphics
Buy for €56.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 187 minutes ago
AMD FX-Series FX-8150 CPU Used 8-Core 8-Thread Desktop Processor 3.6 GHz 8M 125W Socket AM3+
Buy for €51.96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 188 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Athlon 200GE
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2018
FX-8150
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Athlon 200GE | vs | AMD FX-8150 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 6th, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
| Athlon | Collection | FX |
| Raven Ridge | Codename | Zambezi |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.