Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Athlon 200GE outperforms the more expensive FX-6300 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Athlon 200GE is 2144 days newer than the more expensive FX-6300.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 200GE
- Performs up to 6% better in Battlefield 2042 than FX-6300 - 152 vs 144 FPS
- Up to 5% cheaper than FX-6300 - $51.17 vs $54.14
- Up to 12% better value when playing Battlefield 2042 than FX-6300 - $0.37 vs $0.42 per FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 200GE - 6 vs 4 threads
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2018
FPS
152
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.37/FPS
100%
Price, €
€56.8
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €56.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 62 minutes ago
Buy for €60.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 63 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2018
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Athlon 200GE | vs | AMD FX-6300 |
---|---|---|
Sep 6th, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Athlon | Collection | FX |
Raven Ridge | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |