Key Differences
In short — Adamant Custom 16-Core Editing Modelling Rendering Workstation outperforms the cheaper ViprTech Reaper 2.0 Liquid-Cooled on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing ViprTech Reaper 2.0 Liquid-Cooled is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of ViprTech Reaper 2.0 Liquid-Cooled PC
- Up to 85% cheaper than Adamant Custom 16-Core Editing Modelling Rendering Workstation - $1058.55 vs $7117.11
- Up to 63% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than Adamant Custom 16-Core Editing Modelling Rendering Workstation - $27.86 vs $74.92 per FPS
Advantages of Adamant Custom 16-Core Editing Modelling Rendering Workstation Gaming Desktop PC
- Performs up to 150% better in Immortals of Aveum than ViprTech Reaper 2.0 Liquid-Cooled - 95 vs 38 FPS
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FPS
38
40%
Value, €/FPS
€27.86/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1058.55
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €1,058.55 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 161 minutes ago
FPS
95
100%
Value, €/FPS
€74.92/FPS
37%
Price, €
€7117.11
14%
FPS Winner
Buy for €7,117.11 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 163 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
27%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
27%
GeForce RTX 4090
24 GB GDDR6X | 384-bit
Pixel Fillrate
443.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
1290 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
ViprTech Reaper 2.0 Liquid-Cooled PC | vs | Adamant Custom 16-Core Editing Modelling Rendering Workstation Gaming Desktop PC |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Ryzen 7 7700 | CPU | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB | GPU | GeForce RTX 4090 |
32 GB | RAM | 64 GB |
1 TB SSD | Storage | N/A Storage |