Key Differences
In short — Adamant Custom 16-Core Editing Modelling Rendering Workstation outperforms the cheaper ViprTech Ghost 2.0 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing ViprTech Ghost 2.0 is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of ViprTech Ghost 2.0 Gaming PC
- Up to 90% cheaper than Adamant Custom 16-Core Editing Modelling Rendering Workstation - $743.23 vs $7117.11
- Up to 69% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Adamant Custom 16-Core Editing Modelling Rendering Workstation - $10.04 vs $32.50 per FPS
Advantages of Adamant Custom 16-Core Editing Modelling Rendering Workstation Gaming Desktop PC
- Performs up to 196% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than ViprTech Ghost 2.0 - 219 vs 74 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for €743.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 409 minutes ago
FPS
219
100%
Value, €/FPS
€32.50/FPS
31%
Price, €
€7117.11
100%
FPS Winner
Buy for €7,117.11 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 397 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4090
24 GB GDDR6X | 384-bit
Pixel Fillrate
443.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
1290 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
ViprTech Ghost 2.0 Gaming PC | vs | Adamant Custom 16-Core Editing Modelling Rendering Workstation Gaming Desktop PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 5 5600G | CPU | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
| GeForce RTX 3060 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4090 |
| 32 GB | RAM | 64 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | N/A Storage |
