Key Differences
In short — Velztorm Armix CTO outperforms the cheaper Adamant Custom 24-Core Video Editing Modelling Workstation on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Adamant Custom 24-Core Video Editing Modelling Workstation is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Velztorm Armix CTO Gaming Desktop PC
- Performs up to 4% better in No Man's Sky than Adamant Custom 24-Core Video Editing Modelling Workstation - 212 vs 204 FPS
Advantages of Adamant Custom 24-Core Video Editing Modelling Workstation Desktop PC
- Up to 53% cheaper than Velztorm Armix CTO - $2927.92 vs $6250.45
- Up to 51% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Velztorm Armix CTO - $14.35 vs $29.48 per FPS
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
2nd Variation
FPS
212
100%
Value, €/FPS
€29.48/FPS
49%
Price, €
€6250.45
46%
FPS Winner
Buy for €6,250.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 696112 minutes ago
FPS
204
96%
Value, €/FPS
€14.35/FPS
100%
Price, €
€2927.92
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €2,927.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 353523 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
2nd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
2nd Variation
GeForce RTX 4090
24 GB GDDR6X | 384-bit
Pixel Fillrate
443.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
1290 GTexel/s
100%
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
16 GB GDDR6X | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
250.6 GPixel/s
57%
Texel Fillrate
689 GTexel/s
53%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
2nd Variation
Ryzen 9 7900X
4.7 GHz | 12-core
Single-Core
2953
96%
Multi-Core
17898
87%
Velztorm Armix CTO Gaming Desktop PC | vs | Adamant Custom 24-Core Video Editing Modelling Workstation Desktop PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 9 7900X | CPU | Core i9-14900K |
| GeForce RTX 4090 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER |
| 24 GB | RAM | 64 GB |
| 2 TB SSD + 6 TB HDD | Storage | N/A Storage |
