Header Background
Header Background
Background
Background
Background

The Velztorm Armix CTO is the comparison's loser – it's a slightly slower gaming PC Build than the Adamant Custom 24-Core Liquid Cooled Modelling Editing Rendering Workstation and it's also a worse value for money, as it's $1385.60 more expensive!

Advantages of the Velztorm Armix CTO Gaming Desktop PC

The Adamant Custom 24-Core Liquid Cooled Modelling Editing Rendering Workstation Desktop PC is better in every way

Advantages of the Adamant Custom 24-Core Liquid Cooled Modelling Editing Rendering Workstation Desktop PC

  • A slightly faster PC Build for gaming
  • Up to 22% cheaper$4864.85 vs $6250.45
  • A better value for money for gaming

My Games

The FPS you'll get in saved games

The FPS you'll get in saved games

Select Game

Add a Game

Select Settings

GPU Comparison

Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance

Velztorm Armix CTO Gaming Desktop PC Image

Velztorm Armix CTO Gaming Desktop PC

2nd Variation


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Logo
GeForce RTX 4090

24 GB GDDR6X | 384-bit

Pixel Fillrate

443.5 GPixel/s

100%

Texture Fillrate

1290 GTexel/s

100%

FP32

82.58 TFLOPS

100%

CPU Comparison

Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 6 benchmark scores

Full CPU Comparison

Specifications

Comparison of all specifications

Velztorm Armix CTO Gaming Desktop PC Image

Velztorm Armix CTO Gaming Desktop PC

Specifications

Comparison of all specifications

Adamant Custom 24-Core Liquid Cooled Modelling Editing Rendering Workstation Desktop PC Image

Adamant Custom 24-Core Liquid Cooled Modelling Editing Rendering Workstation Desktop PC

General
UnknownRelease DateUnknown
Ryzen 9 7900XCPUCore i9-13900KS
GeForce RTX 4090GPUGeForce RTX 4090
24 GB
RAM16 GB
2 TB SSD + 6 TB HDDStorage8 TB HDD

Velztorm Armix CTO Gaming Desktop PC and Adamant Custom 24-Core Liquid Cooled Modelling Editing Rendering Workstation Desktop PC vs Other PCs

The most compared PCs against the Velztorm Armix CTO Gaming Desktop PC and Adamant Custom 24-Core Liquid Cooled Modelling Editing Rendering Workstation Desktop PC

The most compared PCs against the Velztorm Armix CTO Gaming Desktop PC and Adamant Custom 24-Core Liquid Cooled Modelling Editing Rendering Workstation Desktop PC

6,250.45

Ryzen 9 7900X
GeForce RTX 4090
System-Shared, N/A Storage
vs

6,212.55

Core i9-14900K
GeForce RTX 4080
64 GB, 8 TB SSD

6,250.45

Ryzen 9 7900X
GeForce RTX 4090
System-Shared, N/A Storage
vs

6,305.41

Core i9-13900K
GeForce RTX 4090
24 GB, 4 TB SSD

6,250.45

Ryzen 9 7900X
GeForce RTX 4090
System-Shared, N/A Storage
vs

6,306.30

Core i9-10850K
GeForce RTX 3080
16 GB, 1 TB SSD + 2 TB HDD

6,250.45

Ryzen 9 7900X
GeForce RTX 4090
System-Shared, N/A Storage
vs

6,034.23

Ryzen 9 3900X
GeForce RTX 3090
24 GB, N/A Storage

6,250.45

Ryzen 9 7900X
GeForce RTX 4090
System-Shared, N/A Storage
vs

6,484.68

Core i9-14900KF
GeForce RTX 4090
16 GB, N/A Storage

6,250.45

Ryzen 9 7900X
GeForce RTX 4090
System-Shared, N/A Storage
vs

6,016.22

Ryzen 7 7700X
Radeon RX 6900 XT
64 GB, 8 TB SSD

6,250.45

Ryzen 9 7900X
GeForce RTX 4090
System-Shared, N/A Storage
vs

5,945.94

Core i9-14900KF
GeForce RTX 5090
96 GB, 10 TB HDD

6,250.45

Ryzen 9 7900X
GeForce RTX 4090
System-Shared, N/A Storage
vs

6,576.57

Core i9-14900K
GeForce RTX 4090
16 GB, 6 TB HDD

6,250.45

Ryzen 9 7900X
GeForce RTX 4090
System-Shared, N/A Storage
vs

5,855.85

Core i9-14900KF
GeForce RTX 5090
16 GB, 10 TB HDD

6,250.45

Ryzen 9 7900X
GeForce RTX 4090
System-Shared, N/A Storage
vs

5,854.95

Core i9-10900KF
GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER
32 GB, 1 TB SSD

4,864.85

Core i9-13900KS
GeForce RTX 4090
System-Shared, N/A Storage
vs

4,863.96

Core i9-14900K
GeForce RTX 4090
64 GB, 8 TB SSD

4,864.85

Core i9-13900KS
GeForce RTX 4090
System-Shared, N/A Storage
vs

4,863.96

Core i9-13900K
GeForce RTX 4090
64 GB, 8 TB SSD

4,864.85

Core i9-13900KS
GeForce RTX 4090
System-Shared, N/A Storage
vs

4,872.07

Core i9-14900K
GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER
16 GB, 2 TB SSD + 2 TB HDD

4,864.85

Core i9-13900KS
GeForce RTX 4090
System-Shared, N/A Storage
vs

4,873.97

Core i9-12900K
GeForce RTX 3090
32 GB, 2 TB HDD

4,864.85

Core i9-13900KS
GeForce RTX 4090
System-Shared, N/A Storage
vs

4,914.41

Core i9-13900
GeForce RTX 4060
64 GB, 20 TB HDD

4,864.85

Core i9-13900KS
GeForce RTX 4090
System-Shared, N/A Storage
vs

4,809.91

Core i9-14900KF
GeForce RTX 4090
16 GB, 1 TB SSD

4,864.85

Core i9-13900KS
GeForce RTX 4090
System-Shared, N/A Storage
vs

4,809.91

Core i9-13900K
GeForce RTX 4090
64 GB, 4 TB SSD + 12 TB HDD

4,864.85

Core i9-13900KS
GeForce RTX 4090
System-Shared, N/A Storage
vs

4,919.81

Core i7-13700
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB
64 GB, 20 TB HDD

4,864.85

Core i9-13900KS
GeForce RTX 4090
System-Shared, N/A Storage
vs

4,953.14

Core i9-14900KF
GeForce RTX 4090
64 GB, 2 TB SSD

4,864.85

Core i9-13900KS
GeForce RTX 4090
System-Shared, N/A Storage
vs

4,953.14

Core i9-13900KF
GeForce RTX 4080
32 GB, 1 TB SSD + 2 TB HDD

Copyright © 2025 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.