Key Differences
In short — Skytech Omega outperforms the cheaper Poseidon on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Poseidon is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Skytech Omega Gaming PC
- Performs up to 59% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Poseidon - 145 vs 91 FPS
Advantages of Poseidon Gaming PC
- Up to 41% cheaper than Skytech Omega - $1081.07 vs $1828.82
- Up to 6% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Skytech Omega - $11.88 vs $12.61 per FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Jan 17th, 2024 • 1st Variation
FPS
145
100%
Value, €/FPS
€12.61/FPS
94%
Price, €
€1828.82
59%
FPS Winner
Buy for €1,828.82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 286 minutes ago
Buy for €1,081.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 274 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Jan 17th, 2024 • 1st Variation
2nd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
Jan 17th, 2024 • 1st Variation
GeForce RTX 4070
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
2nd Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
75%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
52%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Jan 17th, 2024 • 1st Variation
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
4.2 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2719
100%
Multi-Core
15172
100%
CPU Winner
Skytech Omega Gaming PC | vs | Poseidon Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 17th, 2024 | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 7 7800X3D | CPU | Ryzen 7 5700X |
| GeForce RTX 4070 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
