Key Differences
In short — Panorama outperforms the cheaper Adamant Custom 24-Core Video Editing Modelling Workstation on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Adamant Custom 24-Core Video Editing Modelling Workstation is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Panorama Gaming PC
- Performs up to 9% better in Grand Theft Auto V than Adamant Custom 24-Core Video Editing Modelling Workstation - 200 vs 184 FPS
Advantages of Adamant Custom 24-Core Video Editing Modelling Workstation Desktop PC
- Up to 19% cheaper than Panorama - $2927.92 vs $3603.59
- Up to 12% better value when playing Grand Theft Auto V than Panorama - $15.91 vs $18.02 per FPS
Grand Theft Auto V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €3,603.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 162 minutes ago
FPS
184
92%
Value, €/FPS
€15.91/FPS
100%
Price, €
€2927.92
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €2,927.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 347796 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
12th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
12th Variation
GeForce RTX 4090
24 GB GDDR6X | 384-bit
Pixel Fillrate
443.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
1290 GTexel/s
100%
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
16 GB GDDR6X | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
250.6 GPixel/s
57%
Texel Fillrate
689 GTexel/s
53%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
12th Variation
Core i9-14900KF
3.2 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
3091
100%
Multi-Core
20685
100%
Panorama Gaming PC | vs | Adamant Custom 24-Core Video Editing Modelling Workstation Desktop PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-14900KF | CPU | Core i9-14900K |
| GeForce RTX 4090 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER |
96 GB | RAM | 64 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
