Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — MXZ outperforms MXZ on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of MXZ Gaming PC
- Performs up to 34% better in No Man's Sky than MXZ - 119 vs 89 FPS
- Up to 20% better value when playing No Man's Sky than MXZ - $6.05 vs $7.58 per FPS
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €674.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 370 minutes ago
Currently Out of Stock
Out of Stock
Updated 356 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
1st Variation
6th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
1st Variation
GeForce RTX 2060
6 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
80.64 GPixel/s
68%
Texel Fillrate
201.6 GTexel/s
85%
6th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
6th Variation
Core i5-12400F
2.5 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
2221
100%
Multi-Core
9125
100%
CPU Winner
MXZ Gaming PC | vs | MXZ Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 5 5500 | CPU | Core i5-12400F |
| GeForce RTX 2060 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 |
| 16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 500 GB SSD | Storage | 500 GB SSD |
