Header Background
Header Background
Background
Background
Background

The MPG Velox by MSI is at least 2x faster gaming PC Build than the Acer Nitro 50 N50. We cannot compare value as at least one PC Build is out of stock.

Advantages of the MPG Velox by MSI Gaming Desktop PC

  • At least 2x faster PC Build for gaming

Advantages of the Acer Nitro 50 N50 Gaming Desktop PC

The MPG Velox by MSI Gaming Desktop PC is better in every way

MPG Velox by MSI Gaming Desktop PC vs Acer Nitro 50 N50 Gaming Desktop PC for Gaming

The PC's performance in selected game and settings

My Games

The FPS you'll get in saved games

The FPS you'll get in saved games

Select Game

Add a Game

Select Settings

GPU Comparison

Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance

Full GPU Comparison
MPG Velox by MSI Gaming Desktop PC Image

MPG Velox by MSI Gaming Desktop PC

33rd Variation


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Logo
GeForce RTX 4060

8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit

Pixel Fillrate

118.1 GPixel/s

100%

Texture Fillrate

236.2 GTexel/s

100%

FP32

15.11 TFLOPS

100%

Acer Nitro 50 N50 Gaming Desktop PC Image

Acer Nitro 50 N50 Gaming Desktop PC

1st Variation


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Logo
GeForce GTX 1650

4 GB GDDR5 | 128-bit

Pixel Fillrate

53.28 GPixel/s

45%

Texture Fillrate

93.24 GTexel/s

39%

FP32

2.984 TFLOPS

20%

CPU Comparison

Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 6 benchmark scores

Full CPU Comparison
MPG Velox by MSI Gaming Desktop PC Image

MPG Velox by MSI Gaming Desktop PC

33rd Variation


AMD Ryzen 7 5700X Logo
Ryzen 7 5700X

3.4 GHz | 8-core

Geekbench 6 Single-Core

2145

97%

Geekbench 6 Multi-Core

9696

100%

Acer Nitro 50 N50 Gaming Desktop PC Image

Acer Nitro 50 N50 Gaming Desktop PC

1st Variation


Intel Core i5-12400F Logo
Core i5-12400F

2.5 GHz | 6-core

Geekbench 6 Single-Core

2221

100%

Geekbench 6 Multi-Core

9125

94%

Specifications

Comparison of all specifications

MPG Velox by MSI Gaming Desktop PC Image

MPG Velox by MSI Gaming Desktop PC

Specifications

Comparison of all specifications

Acer Nitro 50 N50 Gaming Desktop PC Image

Acer Nitro 50 N50 Gaming Desktop PC

General
UnknownRelease DateUnknown
Ryzen 7 5700XCPUCore i5-12400F
GeForce RTX 4060GPUGeForce GTX 1650
32 GB
RAM16 GB
1 TB SSD + 3 TB HDDStorage4 TB SSD + 12 TB HDD

MPG Velox by MSI Gaming Desktop PC and Acer Nitro 50 N50 Gaming Desktop PC vs Other PCs

The most compared PCs against the MPG Velox by MSI Gaming Desktop PC and Acer Nitro 50 N50 Gaming Desktop PC

The most compared PCs against the MPG Velox by MSI Gaming Desktop PC and Acer Nitro 50 N50 Gaming Desktop PC

Core i5-11400F
GeForce GTX 1650
System-Shared, N/A Storage
vs

2,027.02

Ryzen 9 5900X
GeForce RTX 3070
32 GB, 1 TB SSD + 1 TB HDD
Core i5-11400F
GeForce GTX 1650
System-Shared, N/A Storage
vs

2,026.13

Ryzen 7 7700X
GeForce RTX 4060
64 GB, 4 TB SSD
Core i5-11400F
GeForce GTX 1650
System-Shared, N/A Storage
vs

2,026.13

Core i7-14700K
GeForce RTX 4070
64 GB, 2 TB SSD
Core i5-11400F
GeForce GTX 1650
System-Shared, N/A Storage
vs

2,027.02

Core i9-14900K
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
32 GB, 2 TB SSD
Core i5-11400F
GeForce GTX 1650
System-Shared, N/A Storage
vs

2,027.02

Core i7-12700KF
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
32 GB, 512 GB SSD + 3 TB HDD
Core i5-11400F
GeForce GTX 1650
System-Shared, N/A Storage
vs

2,026.13

Ryzen 5 7600
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
16 GB, 512 GB SSD + 6 TB HDD
Core i5-11400F
GeForce GTX 1650
System-Shared, N/A Storage
vs

2,027.02

Core i7-12700
GeForce RTX 3070
32 GB, 1 TB SSD + 1 TB HDD
Core i5-11400F
GeForce GTX 1650
System-Shared, N/A Storage
vs

2,019.81

Core i9-13900
GeForce RTX 4060
64 GB, 1 TB HDD
Core i5-11400F
GeForce GTX 1650
System-Shared, N/A Storage
vs

2,018.65

Core i9-14900F
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
32 GB, 2 TB SSD
Core i5-11400F
GeForce GTX 1650
System-Shared, N/A Storage
vs

2,035.14

Core i9-12900K
GeForce RTX 3070
32 GB, 2 TB SSD + 1 TB HDD

2,027.02

Core i9-13900KF
GeForce RTX 4070
System-Shared, N/A Storage
vs

837.83

Ryzen 5 5600
GeForce RTX 4060
16 GB, 1 TB SSD

2,027.02

Core i9-13900KF
GeForce RTX 4070
System-Shared, N/A Storage
vs

837.83

Core i5-13400F
GeForce RTX 3050
32 GB, N/A Storage

2,027.02

Core i9-13900KF
GeForce RTX 4070
System-Shared, N/A Storage
vs

836.94

Core i5-12400F
GeForce GTX 1650
16 GB, N/A Storage

2,027.02

Core i9-13900KF
GeForce RTX 4070
System-Shared, N/A Storage
vs

837.83

Core i5-12400F
GeForce GTX 1650
16 GB, 512 GB SSD + 1 TB HDD

2,027.02

Core i9-13900KF
GeForce RTX 4070
System-Shared, N/A Storage
vs

837.83

Core i5-12400F
GeForce RTX 3050
16 GB, N/A Storage

2,027.02

Core i9-13900KF
GeForce RTX 4070
System-Shared, N/A Storage
vs

840.41

Core i7-12700
GeForce RTX 3060
16 GB, 512 GB SSD + 1 TB HDD

2,027.02

Core i9-13900KF
GeForce RTX 4070
System-Shared, N/A Storage
vs

828.82

Ryzen 7 5700X
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
8 GB, N/A Storage

2,027.02

Core i9-13900KF
GeForce RTX 4070
System-Shared, N/A Storage
vs

828.82

Core i5-12400
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
32 GB, 1 TB SSD + 2 TB HDD

2,027.02

Core i9-13900KF
GeForce RTX 4070
System-Shared, N/A Storage
vs

828.82

Core i7-10700F
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
8 GB, N/A Storage

2,027.02

Core i9-13900KF
GeForce RTX 4070
System-Shared, N/A Storage
vs

846.84

Core i9-11900KF
Radeon RX 6600 XT
8 GB, N/A Storage

Copyright © 2025 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.