Key Differences
In short — Memory outperforms EMCA4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both PC Builds to compare value.
Advantages of Memory PC
- Performs up to 2% better in No Man's Sky than EMCA4 - 130 vs 128 FPS
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Memory PC
20th Variation
EMCA4 Computer PC
14th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
Memory PC
20th Variation
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
8 GB GDDR6X | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
169.9 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
339.8 GTexel/s
99%
EMCA4 Computer PC
14th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
72%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
EMCA4 Computer PC
14th Variation
Ryzen 5 5500
3.6 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
1874
100%
Multi-Core
7688
100%
CPU Winner
Memory PC | vs | EMCA4 Computer PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-10700 | CPU | Ryzen 5 5500 |
| GeForce RTX 3070 Ti | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 480 GB SSD + 2 TB HDD | Storage | N/A Storage |
