Key Differences
In short — Kiebel outperforms Memory on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both PC Builds to compare value.
Advantages of Kiebel Gaming PC
- Performs up to 4% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Memory - 96 vs 92 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Memory PC
255th Variation
Kiebel Gaming PC
8th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
Memory PC
255th Variation
Radeon RX 6600
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
159.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
279 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
Kiebel Gaming PC
8th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
74%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
85%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Memory PC
255th Variation
Core i7-13700K
3.4 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2840
100%
Multi-Core
17611
100%
CPU Winner
Memory PC | vs | Kiebel Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-13700K | CPU | Core i9-11900KF |
| Radeon RX 6600 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 512 GB SSD + 2 TB HDD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
