Key Differences
In short — Megaport outperforms Memory on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both PC Builds to compare value.
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Performs up to 185% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Memory - 131 vs 46 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Memory PC
241st Variation
Megaport Gaming PC
4th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
Memory PC
241st Variation
GeForce GTX 1650
4 GB GDDR5 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
34%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
20%
GPU Winner
Megaport Gaming PC
4th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Memory PC
241st Variation
Core i9-11900F
2.5 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2171
100%
Multi-Core
9171
94%
CPU Winner
Memory PC | vs | Megaport Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-11900F | CPU | Ryzen 7 5700X |
| GeForce GTX 1650 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 480 GB SSD + 2 TB HDD | Storage | N/A Storage |