Key Differences
In short — Captiva outperforms Memory on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both PC Builds to compare value.
Advantages of Captiva PC
- Performs up to 285% better in Halo Infinite than Memory - 104 vs 27 FPS
Halo Infinite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Memory PC
209th Variation
Captiva PC
4th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
Memory PC
209th Variation
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
4 GB GDDR5 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
44.54 GPixel/s
28%
Texel Fillrate
66.82 GTexel/s
15%
Captiva PC
4th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Captiva PC
4th Variation
Core i9-12900KF
3.2 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2608
100%
Multi-Core
15118
100%
CPU Winner
Memory PC | vs | Captiva PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 5 5500 | CPU | Core i9-12900KF |
| GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 |
| 32 GB | RAM | 64 GB |
| 1000 GB SSD | Storage | N/A Storage |
