Key Differences
In short — MEDION ERAZER Recon E10 outperforms Memory on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both PC Builds to compare value.
Advantages of MEDION ERAZER Recon E10 Gaming Desktop PC
- Performs up to 9% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Memory - 258 vs 237 FPS
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
MEDION ERAZER Recon E10 Gaming Desktop PC
2nd Variation
Memory PC
163rd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
MEDION ERAZER Recon E10 Gaming Desktop PC
2nd Variation
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
6 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
85.68 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
157.1 GTexel/s
79%
GPU Winner
Memory PC
163rd Variation
GeForce RTX 3060
12 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
85.3 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
199 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
MEDION ERAZER Recon E10 Gaming Desktop PC
2nd Variation
Core i5-12400
2.5 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
2179
100%
Multi-Core
8847
100%
CPU Winner
MEDION ERAZER Recon E10 Gaming Desktop PC | vs | Memory PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i5-12400 | CPU | Ryzen 5 5500 |
| GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | GPU | GeForce RTX 3060 |
| 16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | N/A Storage |