Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Alienware Aurora R16 outperforms the more expensive Lenovo LOQ Tower on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Alienware Aurora R16 Gaming Desktop PC
- Performs up to 39% better in F1 22 than Lenovo LOQ Tower - 136 vs 98 FPS
- Up to 9% cheaper than Lenovo LOQ Tower - $1801.79 vs $1981.08
- Up to 34% better value when playing F1 22 than Lenovo LOQ Tower - $13.25 vs $20.22 per FPS
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
3rd Variation
FPS
98
72%
Value, €/FPS
€20.22/FPS
66%
Price, €
€1981.08
90%
Buy for €1,981.08 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 127 minutes ago
Jul 22nd, 2024 • 88th Variation
FPS
136
100%
Value, €/FPS
€13.25/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1801.79
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,801.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 127 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
3rd Variation
Jul 22nd, 2024 • 88th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
3rd Variation
GeForce RTX 3050
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
56.86 GPixel/s
48%
Texel Fillrate
142.2 GTexel/s
60%
Jul 22nd, 2024 • 88th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
3rd Variation
Core i9-14900K
3.2 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
3075
100%
Multi-Core
20563
100%
Jul 22nd, 2024 • 88th Variation
Core i9-13900F
2.0 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
2795
91%
Multi-Core
17379
85%
Lenovo LOQ Gaming Tower Desktop PC | vs | Alienware Aurora R16 Gaming Desktop PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Jul 22nd, 2024 |
| Core i9-14900K | CPU | Core i9-13900F |
| GeForce RTX 3050 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 |
64 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 1 TB SSD + 8 TB HDD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
