Key Differences
In short — ERAZER Engineer X30 High-End outperforms Kiebel on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both PC Builds to compare value.
Advantages of ERAZER Engineer X30 High-End Gaming Desktop PC
- Performs up to 62% better in Dead Space than Kiebel - 112 vs 69 FPS
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
2nd Variation
FPS
112
100%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
FPS Winner
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
12th Variation
2nd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
12th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
60%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
43%
2nd Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
198 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
554.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
2nd Variation
Core i7-14700F
2.1 GHz | 20-core
Single-Core
2775
100%
Multi-Core
17332
100%
CPU Winner
Kiebel Gaming PC | vs | ERAZER Engineer X30 High-End Gaming Desktop PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 7 5700X | CPU | Core i7-14700F |
| GeForce RTX 4060 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | 2 TB SSD |
