Header Background
Header Background
Background
Background
Background

The HP Pavilion is the comparison's loser – it's at least much slower gaming PC Build than the acer Nitro 50 N50-656-UR12 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $224.33 more expensive!

Advantages of the HP Pavilion Gaming Desktop PC

The acer Nitro 50 N50-656-UR12 Gaming Desktop PC is better in every way

Advantages of the acer Nitro 50 N50-656-UR12 Gaming Desktop PC

  • At least 2x faster PC Build for gaming
  • Up to 26% cheaper$630.62 vs $854.95
  • A much better value for money for gaming

My Games

The FPS you'll get in saved games

The FPS you'll get in saved games

Select Game

Add a Game

Select Settings

GPU Comparison

Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance

Full GPU Comparison
HP Pavilion Gaming Desktop PC Image

HP Pavilion Gaming Desktop PC

7th Variation


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Logo
GeForce GTX 1650

4 GB GDDR5 | 128-bit

Pixel Fillrate

53.28 GPixel/s

94%

Texture Fillrate

93.24 GTexel/s

66%

FP32

2.984 TFLOPS

33%

acer Nitro 50 N50-656-UR12 Gaming Desktop PC Image

acer Nitro 50 N50-656-UR12 Gaming Desktop PC

Apr 14th, 2024


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Logo
GeForce RTX 3050

8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit

Pixel Fillrate

56.86 GPixel/s

100%

Texture Fillrate

142.2 GTexel/s

100%

FP32

9.098 TFLOPS

100%

CPU Comparison

Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 6 benchmark scores

Full CPU Comparison
HP Pavilion Gaming Desktop PC Image

HP Pavilion Gaming Desktop PC

7th Variation


Intel Core i7-9700K Logo
Core i7-9700K

3.6 GHz | 8-core

Geekbench 6 Single-Core

1692

72%

Geekbench 6 Multi-Core

7176

63%

acer Nitro 50 N50-656-UR12 Gaming Desktop PC Image

acer Nitro 50 N50-656-UR12 Gaming Desktop PC

Apr 14th, 2024


Intel Core i5-14400F Logo
Core i5-14400F

2.5 GHz | 10-core

Geekbench 6 Single-Core

2337

100%

Geekbench 6 Multi-Core

11377

100%

HP Pavilion Gaming Desktop PC Image

HP Pavilion Gaming Desktop PC

acer Nitro 50 N50-656-UR12 Gaming Desktop PC Image

acer Nitro 50 N50-656-UR12 Gaming Desktop PC

General
UnknownRelease DateApr 14th, 2024
Core i7-9700KCPUCore i5-14400F
GeForce GTX 1650GPUGeForce RTX 3050
16 GBRAM16 GB
1 TB SSDStorageN/A Storage

HP Pavilion Gaming Desktop PC and acer Nitro 50 N50-656-UR12 Gaming Desktop PC vs Other PCs

The most compared PCs against the HP Pavilion Gaming Desktop PC and acer Nitro 50 N50-656-UR12 Gaming Desktop PC

The most compared PCs against the HP Pavilion Gaming Desktop PC and acer Nitro 50 N50-656-UR12 Gaming Desktop PC

630.62

Core i5-14400F
GeForce RTX 3050
System-Shared, N/A Storage
vs

890.99

Core i5-9400F
GeForce GTX 1660
8 GB, 120 GB SSD + 1 TB HDD

630.62

Core i5-14400F
GeForce RTX 3050
System-Shared, N/A Storage
vs

891.88

Core i5-10400F
GeForce GTX 1660
16 GB, N/A Storage

630.62

Core i5-14400F
GeForce RTX 3050
System-Shared, N/A Storage
vs

891.88

Ryzen 7 5700G
GeForce RTX 3060
16 GB, 1 TB SSD + 4 TB HDD

630.62

Core i5-14400F
GeForce RTX 3050
System-Shared, N/A Storage
vs

890.99

Core i5-13400
GeForce GTX 1650
16 GB, 1 TB HDD

630.62

Core i5-14400F
GeForce RTX 3050
System-Shared, N/A Storage
vs

890.99

Core i5-12400F
GeForce GTX 1650
32 GB, 1 TB SSD + 2 TB HDD

630.62

Core i5-14400F
GeForce RTX 3050
System-Shared, N/A Storage
vs

895.50

Core i5-10400F
GeForce RTX 3060
8 GB, 1 TB SSD

630.62

Core i5-14400F
GeForce RTX 3050
System-Shared, N/A Storage
vs

884.62

Core i5-13400F
GeForce RTX 4060
16 GB, N/A Storage

630.62

Core i5-14400F
GeForce RTX 3050
System-Shared, N/A Storage
vs

898.19

Core i7-10700
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
16 GB, 512 GB SSD + 1 TB HDD

630.62

Core i5-14400F
GeForce RTX 3050
System-Shared, N/A Storage
vs

882.87

Core i7-12700
GeForce RTX 3050
16 GB, 1 TB SSD

630.62

Core i5-14400F
GeForce RTX 3050
System-Shared, N/A Storage
vs

882.87

Core i5-11400F
GeForce RTX 3050
8 GB, N/A Storage

890.99

Core i7-9700K
GeForce GTX 1650
System-Shared, N/A Storage
vs

630.62

Ryzen 5 3600
GeForce GTX 1650
16 GB, 500 GB SSD

890.99

Core i7-9700K
GeForce GTX 1650
System-Shared, N/A Storage
vs

629.73

Core i5-13400F
GeForce GTX 1650
8 GB, 512 GB SSD

890.99

Core i7-9700K
GeForce GTX 1650
System-Shared, N/A Storage
vs

629.73

Core i5-12400F
GeForce GTX 1650
16 GB, N/A Storage

890.99

Core i7-9700K
GeForce GTX 1650
System-Shared, N/A Storage
vs

629.73

Core i5-10400F
GeForce GTX 1650
8 GB, N/A Storage

890.99

Core i7-9700K
GeForce GTX 1650
System-Shared, N/A Storage
vs

630.62

Ryzen 5 2600
GeForce GTX 1650
8 GB, N/A Storage

890.99

Core i7-9700K
GeForce GTX 1650
System-Shared, N/A Storage
vs

629.73

Core i5-12400F
GeForce GTX 1650
16 GB, N/A Storage

890.99

Core i7-9700K
GeForce GTX 1650
System-Shared, N/A Storage
vs

630.62

Core i5-13400F
GeForce RTX 3060
16 GB, 512 GB SSD + 1 TB HDD

890.99

Core i7-9700K
GeForce GTX 1650
System-Shared, N/A Storage
vs

630.62

Core i3-13100
GeForce RTX 3050
16 GB, 500 GB SSD

890.99

Core i7-9700K
GeForce GTX 1650
System-Shared, N/A Storage
vs

622.73

Core i5-12400F
GeForce GTX 1650
64 GB, 4 TB SSD + 6 TB HDD

890.99

Core i7-9700K
GeForce GTX 1650
System-Shared, N/A Storage
vs

619.82

Core i5-10400F
GeForce GTX 1650
8 GB, 256 GB SSD

Copyright © 2025 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.