Key Differences
In short — FANAT outperforms shinobee High End on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both PC Builds to compare value.
Advantages of FANAT Gaming PC
- Performs up to 3% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than shinobee High End - 69 vs 67 FPS
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
3rd Variation
10th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
3rd Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
10th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
3rd Variation
Ryzen 5 5600X
3.7 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
2113
100%
Multi-Core
8690
90%
CPU Winner
10th Variation
Ryzen 9 6900HX
3.3 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
1999
95%
Multi-Core
9644
100%
FANAT Gaming PC | vs | shinobee High End Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 5 5600X | CPU | Ryzen 9 6900HX |
| GeForce RTX 4060 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 1000 GB SSD | Storage | N/A Storage |
