Key Differences
In short — Adamant Custom 16-Core Video Editing Modelling Workstation outperforms EMCA4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both PC Builds to compare value.
Advantages of Adamant Custom 16-Core Video Editing Modelling Workstation Desktop PC
- Performs up to 22% better in Counter-Strike 2 than EMCA4 - 531 vs 436 FPS
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
FPS
531
100%
Value, €/FPS
€8.62/FPS
100%
Price, €
€4576.57
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €4,576.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 318 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
55th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
55th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
55%
Texel Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
56%
GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER
16 GB GDDR6X | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
285.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
816 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
55th Variation
Core i5-14600KF
3.5 GHz | 14-core
Single-Core
2769
95%
Multi-Core
15636
80%
EMCA4 Computer PC | vs | Adamant Custom 16-Core Video Editing Modelling Workstation Desktop PC |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Core i5-14600KF | CPU | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
GeForce RTX 4070 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
N/A Storage | Storage | 10 TB HDD |