Key Differences
In short — Dell Alienware Aurora R16 outperforms the cheaper Adamant Custom 24-Core Video Editing Modelling Workstation on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Adamant Custom 24-Core Video Editing Modelling Workstation is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Dell Alienware Aurora R16 Gaming Desktop PC
- Performs up to 7% better in Starfield than Adamant Custom 24-Core Video Editing Modelling Workstation - 75 vs 70 FPS
Advantages of Adamant Custom 24-Core Video Editing Modelling Workstation Desktop PC
- Up to 7% cheaper than Dell Alienware Aurora R16 - $2927.92 vs $3138.61
- Up to 0% better value when playing Starfield than Dell Alienware Aurora R16 - $41.83 vs $41.85 per FPS
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
24th Variation
FPS
75
100%
Value, €/FPS
€41.85/FPS
100%
Price, €
€3138.61
93%
FPS Winner
Buy for €3,138.61 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 167 minutes ago
FPS
70
93%
Value, €/FPS
€41.83/FPS
100%
Price, €
€2927.92
100%
Buy for €2,927.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 337124 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
24th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
24th Variation
GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER
16 GB GDDR6X | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
285.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
816 GTexel/s
100%
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
16 GB GDDR6X | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
250.6 GPixel/s
88%
Texel Fillrate
689 GTexel/s
84%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
24th Variation
Core i9-14900F
2.0 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
3020
97%
Multi-Core
18270
87%
Dell Alienware Aurora R16 Gaming Desktop PC | vs | Adamant Custom 24-Core Video Editing Modelling Workstation Desktop PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-14900F | CPU | Core i9-14900K |
| GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER |
| 64 GB | RAM | 64 GB |
| 4 TB SSD | Storage | N/A Storage |
