Key Differences
In short — Centaurus Vega 3.1 outperforms the cheaper Alienware Aurora R16 Liquid Cooled on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Alienware Aurora R16 Liquid Cooled is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Centaurus Vega 3.1 Gaming Desktop PC
- Performs up to 3% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Alienware Aurora R16 Liquid Cooled - 122 vs 119 FPS
Advantages of Alienware Aurora R16 Liquid Cooled Gaming Desktop PC
- Up to 11% cheaper than Centaurus Vega 3.1 - $2058.73 vs $2315.31
- Up to 9% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Centaurus Vega 3.1 - $17.30 vs $18.98 per FPS
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
FPS
122
100%
Value, €/FPS
€18.98/FPS
91%
Price, €
€2315.31
88%
FPS Winner
Buy for €2,315.31 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5930 minutes ago
FPS
119
98%
Value, €/FPS
€17.3/FPS
100%
Price, €
€2058.73
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €2,058.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5929 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
16 GB GDDR6X | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
250.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
689 GTexel/s
100%
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
198 GPixel/s
79%
Texel Fillrate
554.4 GTexel/s
80%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Centaurus Vega 3.1 Gaming Desktop PC | vs | Alienware Aurora R16 Liquid Cooled Gaming Desktop PC |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Aug 3rd, 2023 |
Core i9-13900 | CPU | Core i9-14900F |
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
64 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
1 TB SSD + 2 TB HDD | Storage | 1 TB SSD + 1 TB HDD |