Key Differences
In short — Panorama outperforms the cheaper Alienware Aurora R16 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Alienware Aurora R16 is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Alienware Aurora R16 Gaming Desktop PC
- Up to 39% cheaper than Panorama - $1484.66 vs $2432.42
- Up to 16% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Panorama - $9.96 vs $11.92 per FPS
Advantages of Panorama Gaming PC
- Performs up to 37% better in No Man's Sky than Alienware Aurora R16 - 204 vs 149 FPS
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
50th Variation
FPS
149
73%
Value, €/FPS
€9.96/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1484.66
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €1,484.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 239 minutes ago
Buy for €2,432.42 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 241 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
50th Variation
4th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
50th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
49%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
50%
4th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
16 GB GDDR6X | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
250.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
689 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
50th Variation
Core i7-14700F
2.1 GHz | 20-core
Single-Core
2713
88%
Multi-Core
16688
81%
4th Variation
Core i9-14900KF
3.2 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
3091
100%
Multi-Core
20685
100%
CPU Winner
Alienware Aurora R16 Gaming Desktop PC | vs | Panorama Gaming PC |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Core i7-14700F | CPU | Core i9-14900KF |
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER |
32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
1 TB SSD | Storage | 1 TB SSD + 3 TB HDD |