Key Differences
In short — Adamant Custom 24-Core Video Editing Modelling Workstation outperforms the cheaper ViprTech Ghost on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing ViprTech Ghost is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Adamant Custom 24-Core Video Editing Modelling Workstation Desktop PC
- Performs up to 179% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than ViprTech Ghost - 156 vs 56 FPS
Advantages of ViprTech Ghost Gaming PC
- Up to 81% cheaper than Adamant Custom 24-Core Video Editing Modelling Workstation - $707.20 vs $3648.64
- Up to 46% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Adamant Custom 24-Core Video Editing Modelling Workstation - $12.63 vs $23.39 per FPS
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
FPS
156
100%
Value, €/FPS
€23.39/FPS
54%
Price, €
€3648.64
19%
FPS Winner
Buy for €3,648.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6259 minutes ago
Buy for €707.2 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6258 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
198 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
554.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Adamant Custom 24-Core Video Editing Modelling Workstation Desktop PC | vs | ViprTech Ghost Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-14900K | CPU | Ryzen 5 5600 |
| GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER | GPU | GeForce RTX 3060 |
| 16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | 512 GB SSD |
