Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Adamant Custom 24-Core Video Editing Modelling Workstation outperforms the more expensive Adamant Custom 24-Core Modelling Editing Rendering Workstation on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Adamant Custom 24-Core Video Editing Modelling Workstation Desktop PC
- Performs up to 1% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Adamant Custom 24-Core Modelling Editing Rendering Workstation - 225 vs 222 FPS
- Up to 6% cheaper than Adamant Custom 24-Core Modelling Editing Rendering Workstation - $6756.75 vs $7207.20
- Up to 7% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Adamant Custom 24-Core Modelling Editing Rendering Workstation - $30.03 vs $32.46 per FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
FPS
225
100%
Value, €/FPS
€30.03/FPS
100%
Price, €
€6756.75
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €6,756.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 272 minutes ago
FPS
222
99%
Value, €/FPS
€32.46/FPS
93%
Price, €
€7207.2
93%
Buy for €7,207.2 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 283 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4090
24 GB GDDR6X | 384-bit
Pixel Fillrate
443.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
1290 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
GeForce RTX 4090
24 GB GDDR6X | 384-bit
Pixel Fillrate
443.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
1290 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Adamant Custom 24-Core Video Editing Modelling Workstation Desktop PC | vs | Adamant Custom 24-Core Modelling Editing Rendering Workstation Desktop PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-14900K | CPU | Core i9-13900K |
| GeForce RTX 4090 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4090 |
| 16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
