Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Alienware Aurora R16 outperforms the more expensive Adamant Custom 16-Core Video Editing Rendering Modelling Workstation on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Alienware Aurora R16 Gaming Desktop PC
- Performs up to 9% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Adamant Custom 16-Core Video Editing Rendering Modelling Workstation - 222 vs 203 FPS
- Up to 3% cheaper than Adamant Custom 16-Core Video Editing Rendering Modelling Workstation - $4458.56 vs $4594.59
- Up to 11% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Adamant Custom 16-Core Video Editing Rendering Modelling Workstation - $20.08 vs $22.63 per FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
FPS
203
91%
Value, €/FPS
€22.63/FPS
89%
Price, €
€4594.59
97%
Buy for €4,594.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 184493 minutes ago
77th Variation
FPS
222
100%
Value, €/FPS
€20.08/FPS
100%
Price, €
€4458.56
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €4,458.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 181 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
77th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4090
24 GB GDDR6X | 384-bit
Pixel Fillrate
443.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
1290 GTexel/s
100%
77th Variation
GeForce RTX 4090
24 GB GDDR6X | 384-bit
Pixel Fillrate
443.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
1290 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
77th Variation
Core i9-13900K
3.0 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
2974
100%
Multi-Core
20148
100%
CPU Winner
Adamant Custom 16-Core Video Editing Rendering Modelling Workstation Computer PC | vs | Alienware Aurora R16 Gaming Desktop PC |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Ryzen 9 5950X | CPU | Core i9-13900K |
GeForce RTX 4090 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4090 |
64 GB | RAM | 64 GB |
4 TB HDD | Storage | 1 TB SSD + 6 TB HDD |