Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Mavark 4K outperforms the more expensive Adamant Custom 16-Core Video Editing Modelling Workstation on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Mavark 4K Gaming PC
- Performs up to 1% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Adamant Custom 16-Core Video Editing Modelling Workstation - 587 vs 579 FPS
- Up to 6% cheaper than Adamant Custom 16-Core Video Editing Modelling Workstation - $6845.95 vs $7297.29
- Up to 7% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Adamant Custom 16-Core Video Editing Modelling Workstation - $11.66 vs $12.60 per FPS
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
FPS
579
99%
Value, €/FPS
€12.6/FPS
93%
Price, €
€7297.29
93%
Buy for €7,297.29 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 294 minutes ago
2nd Variation
FPS
587
100%
Value, €/FPS
€11.66/FPS
100%
Price, €
€6845.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €6,845.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 295 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
2nd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4090
24 GB GDDR6X | 384-bit
Pixel Fillrate
443.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
1290 GTexel/s
100%
2nd Variation
GeForce RTX 4090
24 GB GDDR6X | 384-bit
Pixel Fillrate
443.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
1290 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
2nd Variation
Core i9-13900K
3.0 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
2974
100%
Multi-Core
20148
100%
CPU Winner
Adamant Custom 16-Core Video Editing Modelling Workstation Desktop PC | vs | Mavark 4K Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 9 7950X3D | CPU | Core i9-13900K |
| GeForce RTX 4090 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4090 |
| 16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | 8 TB SSD |
