Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Adamant Custom 24-Core Modelling Editing Rendering Workstation outperforms the more expensive Adamant Custom 16-Core Video Editing Modelling Workstation on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Adamant Custom 24-Core Modelling Editing Rendering Workstation Desktop PC
- Performs up to 1% better in God of War than Adamant Custom 16-Core Video Editing Modelling Workstation - 199 vs 198 FPS
- Up to 1% cheaper than Adamant Custom 16-Core Video Editing Modelling Workstation - $7207.20 vs $7297.29
- Up to 2% better value when playing God of War than Adamant Custom 16-Core Video Editing Modelling Workstation - $36.22 vs $36.86 per FPS
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FPS
198
99%
Value, €/FPS
€36.86/FPS
98%
Price, €
€7297.29
98%
Buy for €7,297.29 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 273 minutes ago
FPS
199
100%
Value, €/FPS
€36.22/FPS
100%
Price, €
€7207.2
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €7,207.2 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 291 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4090
24 GB GDDR6X | 384-bit
Pixel Fillrate
443.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
1290 GTexel/s
100%
GeForce RTX 4090
24 GB GDDR6X | 384-bit
Pixel Fillrate
443.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
1290 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Adamant Custom 16-Core Video Editing Modelling Workstation Desktop PC | vs | Adamant Custom 24-Core Modelling Editing Rendering Workstation Desktop PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 9 7950X3D | CPU | Core i9-13900K |
| GeForce RTX 4090 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4090 |
| 16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
