Key Differences
In short — Mavark 4K outperforms the cheaper Adamant Custom 16-Core Video Editing Modelling Workstation on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Adamant Custom 16-Core Video Editing Modelling Workstation is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Adamant Custom 16-Core Video Editing Modelling Workstation Desktop PC
- Up to 54% cheaper than Mavark 4K - $3153.14 vs $6845.95
- Up to 20% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Mavark 4K - $33.54 vs $42.00 per FPS
Advantages of Mavark 4K Gaming PC
- Performs up to 73% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Adamant Custom 16-Core Video Editing Modelling Workstation - 163 vs 94 FPS
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
FPS
94
58%
Value, €/FPS
€33.54/FPS
100%
Price, €
€3153.14
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €3,153.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 173 minutes ago
Buy for €6,845.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 171 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
2nd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
198 GPixel/s
45%
Texel Fillrate
554.4 GTexel/s
43%
2nd Variation
GeForce RTX 4090
24 GB GDDR6X | 384-bit
Pixel Fillrate
443.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
1290 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
2nd Variation
Core i9-13900K
3.0 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
2974
100%
Multi-Core
20148
100%
CPU Winner
Adamant Custom 16-Core Video Editing Modelling Workstation Desktop PC | vs | Mavark 4K Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 9 7950X3D | CPU | Core i9-13900K |
| GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER | GPU | GeForce RTX 4090 |
| 16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | 8 TB SSD |
