Header Background
Header Background
Background
Background
Background

The Adamant Custom 16-Core Video Editing Modelling Workstation is at least 2x faster gaming PC Build than the HP Pavilion, however, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $2064.86 more expensive!

Advantages of the Adamant Custom 16-Core Video Editing Modelling Workstation Desktop PC

  • At least 2x faster PC Build for gaming

Advantages of the HP Pavilion Gaming Desktop PC

  • Up to 75% cheaper$682.88 vs $2747.74
  • A much better value for money for gaming

My Games

The FPS you'll get in saved games

The FPS you'll get in saved games

Select Game

Add a Game

Select Settings

GPU Comparison

Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance

Full GPU Comparison
Adamant Custom 16-Core Video Editing Modelling Workstation Desktop PC Image

Adamant Custom 16-Core Video Editing Modelling Workstation Desktop PC

2nd Variation


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB Logo
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB

8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit

Pixel Fillrate

121.7 GPixel/s

100%

Texture Fillrate

344.8 GTexel/s

100%

FP32

22.06 TFLOPS

100%

HP Pavilion Gaming Desktop PC Image

HP Pavilion Gaming Desktop PC

Oct 5th, 2021, 2nd Variation


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Logo
GeForce RTX 3060

12 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit

Pixel Fillrate

85.3 GPixel/s

70%

Texture Fillrate

199 GTexel/s

58%

FP32

12.74 TFLOPS

58%

CPU Comparison

Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 6 benchmark scores

Full CPU Comparison
Adamant Custom 16-Core Video Editing Modelling Workstation Desktop PC Image

Adamant Custom 16-Core Video Editing Modelling Workstation Desktop PC

HP Pavilion Gaming Desktop PC Image

HP Pavilion Gaming Desktop PC

General
UnknownRelease DateOct 5th, 2021
Ryzen 9 7950X3DCPUCore i5-10400F
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GBGPUGeForce RTX 3060
16 GB
RAM8 GB
N/A StorageStorage512 GB SSD

Adamant Custom 16-Core Video Editing Modelling Workstation Desktop PC and HP Pavilion Gaming Desktop PC vs Other PCs

The most compared PCs against the Adamant Custom 16-Core Video Editing Modelling Workstation Desktop PC and HP Pavilion Gaming Desktop PC

The most compared PCs against the Adamant Custom 16-Core Video Editing Modelling Workstation Desktop PC and HP Pavilion Gaming Desktop PC

Ryzen 5 5600G
GeForce RTX 3060
System-Shared, N/A Storage
vs

2,746.85

Core i7-14700K
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB
32 GB, 1 TB SSD + 16 TB HDD
Ryzen 5 5600G
GeForce RTX 3060
System-Shared, N/A Storage
vs

2,746.85

Core i7-13700K
GeForce RTX 3080
64 GB, 4 TB SSD
Ryzen 5 5600G
GeForce RTX 3060
System-Shared, N/A Storage
vs

2,746.85

Core i9-13900K
GeForce RTX 3070
64 GB, 1 TB SSD + 20 TB HDD
Ryzen 5 5600G
GeForce RTX 3060
System-Shared, N/A Storage
vs

2,754.95

Core i7-13700K
GeForce RTX 4070
64 GB, 8 TB SSD
Ryzen 5 5600G
GeForce RTX 3060
System-Shared, N/A Storage
vs

2,760.04

Ryzen 9 5900X
GeForce RTX 3090
16 GB, 1 TB SSD
Ryzen 5 5600G
GeForce RTX 3060
System-Shared, N/A Storage
vs

2,764.54

Core i7-13700
GeForce RTX 4060
64 GB, 4 TB HDD
Ryzen 5 5600G
GeForce RTX 3060
System-Shared, N/A Storage
vs

2,764.86

Core i9-14900K
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB
64 GB, 2 TB SSD + 4 TB HDD
Ryzen 5 5600G
GeForce RTX 3060
System-Shared, N/A Storage
vs

2,764.86

Core i9-13900K
GeForce RTX 3050
32 GB, 2 TB SSD + 20 TB HDD
Ryzen 5 5600G
GeForce RTX 3060
System-Shared, N/A Storage
vs

2,728.83

Core i9-13900K
GeForce RTX 3080
64 GB, 1 TB SSD + 1 TB HDD
Ryzen 5 5600G
GeForce RTX 3060
System-Shared, N/A Storage
vs

2,728.83

Core i9-14900K
GeForce RTX 4070
32 GB, 2 TB SSD + 1 TB HDD

612.61

Core i5-10400F
GeForce GTX 1650
System-Shared, N/A Storage
vs

612.60

Core i3-10100
GeForce GTX 1650
16 GB, 500 GB SSD

612.61

Core i5-10400F
GeForce GTX 1650
System-Shared, N/A Storage
vs

612.60

Ryzen 7 5700X
GeForce RTX 3060
32 GB, 1 TB SSD

612.61

Core i5-10400F
GeForce GTX 1650
System-Shared, N/A Storage
vs

611.71

Ryzen 7 5700G
Radeon RX 6600 XT
32 GB, N/A Storage

612.61

Core i5-10400F
GeForce GTX 1650
System-Shared, N/A Storage
vs

606.16

Core i7-13700KF
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB
32 GB, 1 TB SSD

612.61

Core i5-10400F
GeForce GTX 1650
System-Shared, N/A Storage
vs

619.82

Core i5-10400F
GeForce GTX 1650
8 GB, 256 GB SSD

612.61

Core i5-10400F
GeForce GTX 1650
System-Shared, N/A Storage
vs

603.59

Core i5-11400F
GeForce GTX 1650
8 GB, 512 GB SSD

612.61

Core i5-10400F
GeForce GTX 1650
System-Shared, N/A Storage
vs

603.59

Core i5-10400F
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
16 GB, 512 GB SSD

612.61

Core i5-10400F
GeForce GTX 1650
System-Shared, N/A Storage
vs

629.73

Core i5-13400F
GeForce GTX 1650
8 GB, 512 GB SSD

612.61

Core i5-10400F
GeForce GTX 1650
System-Shared, N/A Storage
vs

629.73

Core i5-12400F
GeForce GTX 1650
16 GB, N/A Storage

612.61

Core i5-10400F
GeForce GTX 1650
System-Shared, N/A Storage
vs

629.73

Core i5-10400F
GeForce GTX 1650
8 GB, N/A Storage

Copyright © 2025 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.