Key Differences
In short — Adamant Custom 16-Core Editing Modelling Rendering Workstation outperforms the cheaper Velztorm Armix CTO on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Velztorm Armix CTO is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Adamant Custom 16-Core Editing Modelling Rendering Workstation Gaming Desktop PC
- Performs up to 0% better in Borderlands 3 than Velztorm Armix CTO - 261 vs 260 FPS
Advantages of Velztorm Armix CTO Gaming Desktop PC
- Up to 12% cheaper than Adamant Custom 16-Core Editing Modelling Rendering Workstation - $6250.45 vs $7117.11
- Up to 12% better value when playing Borderlands 3 than Adamant Custom 16-Core Editing Modelling Rendering Workstation - $24.04 vs $27.27 per FPS
Borderlands 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
FPS
261
100%
Value, €/FPS
€27.27/FPS
88%
Price, €
€7117.11
87%
Buy for €7,117.11 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8690 minutes ago
2nd Variation
FPS
260
100%
Value, €/FPS
€24.04/FPS
100%
Price, €
€6250.45
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €6,250.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 679666 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
2nd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4090
24 GB GDDR6X | 384-bit
Pixel Fillrate
443.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
1290 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
2nd Variation
GeForce RTX 4090
24 GB GDDR6X | 384-bit
Pixel Fillrate
443.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
1290 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
2nd Variation
Ryzen 9 7900X
4.7 GHz | 12-core
Single-Core
2923
100%
Multi-Core
17849
91%
Adamant Custom 16-Core Editing Modelling Rendering Workstation Gaming Desktop PC | vs | Velztorm Armix CTO Gaming Desktop PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 9 7950X3D | CPU | Ryzen 9 7900X |
| GeForce RTX 4090 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4090 |
64 GB | RAM | 24 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | 2 TB SSD + 6 TB HDD |
