Header Background
Header Background
Background
Background
Background

The Acer Nitro 50 N50 is at least 2x slower gaming PC Build than the Adamant Custom 24-Core Modelling Editing Rendering Workstation, however, it's a better value for money, as it's $6235.12 cheaper!

Advantages of the Acer Nitro 50 N50 Gaming Desktop PC

  • Up to 88% cheaper$836.94 vs $7072.06
  • A better value for money for gaming

Advantages of the Adamant Custom 24-Core Modelling Editing Rendering Workstation Desktop PC

  • At least 2x faster PC Build for gaming

My Games

The FPS you'll get in saved games

The FPS you'll get in saved games

Select Game

Add a Game

Select Settings

GPU Comparison

Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance

Full GPU Comparison
Acer Nitro 50 N50 Gaming Desktop PC Image

Acer Nitro 50 N50 Gaming Desktop PC

2nd Variation


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Logo
GeForce GTX 1650

4 GB GDDR5 | 128-bit

Pixel Fillrate

53.28 GPixel/s

12%

Texture Fillrate

93.24 GTexel/s

7%

FP32

2.984 TFLOPS

4%

Adamant Custom 24-Core Modelling Editing Rendering Workstation Desktop PC Image

Adamant Custom 24-Core Modelling Editing Rendering Workstation Desktop PC

3rd Variation


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Logo
GeForce RTX 4090

24 GB GDDR6X | 384-bit

Pixel Fillrate

443.5 GPixel/s

100%

Texture Fillrate

1290 GTexel/s

100%

FP32

82.58 TFLOPS

100%

CPU Comparison

Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 6 benchmark scores

Full CPU Comparison

Specifications

Comparison of all specifications

Specifications

Comparison of all specifications

General
UnknownRelease DateUnknown
Core i5-12400FCPUCore i9-13900K
GeForce GTX 1650GPUGeForce RTX 4090
32 GB
RAM16 GB
N/A StorageStorage6 TB HDD

Acer Nitro 50 N50 Gaming Desktop PC and Adamant Custom 24-Core Modelling Editing Rendering Workstation Desktop PC vs Other PCs

The most compared PCs against the Acer Nitro 50 N50 Gaming Desktop PC and Adamant Custom 24-Core Modelling Editing Rendering Workstation Desktop PC

The most compared PCs against the Acer Nitro 50 N50 Gaming Desktop PC and Adamant Custom 24-Core Modelling Editing Rendering Workstation Desktop PC

836.94

Core i5-12400F
GeForce GTX 1650
System-Shared, N/A Storage
vs

837.83

Ryzen 5 5600
GeForce RTX 4060
16 GB, 1 TB SSD

836.94

Core i5-12400F
GeForce GTX 1650
System-Shared, N/A Storage
vs

837.83

Core i5-13400F
GeForce RTX 3050
32 GB, N/A Storage

836.94

Core i5-12400F
GeForce GTX 1650
System-Shared, N/A Storage
vs

836.94

Core i5-12400F
GeForce GTX 1650
32 GB, N/A Storage

836.94

Core i5-12400F
GeForce GTX 1650
System-Shared, N/A Storage
vs

837.83

Core i5-12400F
GeForce GTX 1650
16 GB, 512 GB SSD + 1 TB HDD

836.94

Core i5-12400F
GeForce GTX 1650
System-Shared, N/A Storage
vs

837.83

Core i5-12400F
GeForce RTX 3050
16 GB, N/A Storage

836.94

Core i5-12400F
GeForce GTX 1650
System-Shared, N/A Storage
vs

840.41

Core i7-12700
GeForce RTX 3060
16 GB, 512 GB SSD + 1 TB HDD

836.94

Core i5-12400F
GeForce GTX 1650
System-Shared, N/A Storage
vs

828.77

Core i5-13400F
GeForce RTX 3050
8 GB, 512 GB SSD

836.94

Core i5-12400F
GeForce GTX 1650
System-Shared, N/A Storage
vs

828.82

Core i5-12400
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
32 GB, 1 TB SSD + 2 TB HDD

836.94

Core i5-12400F
GeForce GTX 1650
System-Shared, N/A Storage
vs

828.82

Core i7-10700F
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
8 GB, N/A Storage

836.94

Core i5-12400F
GeForce GTX 1650
System-Shared, N/A Storage
vs

846.84

Core i9-11900KF
Radeon RX 6600 XT
8 GB, N/A Storage

7,072.06

Core i9-13900K
GeForce RTX 4090
System-Shared, N/A Storage
vs

7,117.11

Core i9-14900K
GeForce RTX 4090
16 GB, 10 TB HDD

7,072.06

Core i9-13900K
GeForce RTX 4090
System-Shared, N/A Storage
vs

6,936.93

Core i9-14900K
GeForce RTX 4090
64 GB, 10 TB HDD

7,072.06

Core i9-13900K
GeForce RTX 4090
System-Shared, N/A Storage
vs

7,297.29

Ryzen 9 7950X3D
GeForce RTX 4090
16 GB, N/A Storage

7,072.06

Core i9-13900K
GeForce RTX 4090
System-Shared, N/A Storage
vs

6,845.95

Core i9-13900K
GeForce RTX 4090
16 GB, 8 TB SSD

7,072.06

Core i9-13900K
GeForce RTX 4090
System-Shared, N/A Storage
vs

6,756.75

Core i9-14900K
GeForce RTX 4090
16 GB, N/A Storage

7,072.06

Core i9-13900K
GeForce RTX 4090
System-Shared, N/A Storage
vs

6,756.75

Core i9-14900K
GeForce RTX 4090
16 GB, N/A Storage

7,072.06

Core i9-13900K
GeForce RTX 4090
System-Shared, N/A Storage
vs

6,576.57

Core i9-14900K
GeForce RTX 4090
16 GB, 6 TB HDD

7,072.06

Core i9-13900K
GeForce RTX 4090
System-Shared, N/A Storage
vs

6,528.17

Core i9-13900K
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
64 GB, 20 TB HDD

7,072.06

Core i9-13900K
GeForce RTX 4090
System-Shared, N/A Storage
vs

6,484.68

Core i9-14900KF
GeForce RTX 4090
16 GB, N/A Storage

7,072.06

Core i9-13900K
GeForce RTX 4090
System-Shared, N/A Storage
vs

7,729.72

Ryzen 9 7950X3D
GeForce RTX 4090
16 GB, 10 TB HDD

Copyright © 2025 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.