Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — STGAubron outperforms the more expensive Acer Nitro 50 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of STGAubron Gaming PC
- Performs up to 2850% better in Overwatch 2 than Acer Nitro 50 - 236 vs 8 FPS
- Up to 11% cheaper than Acer Nitro 50 - $918.91 vs $1035.14
- Up to 97% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than Acer Nitro 50 - $3.89 vs $129.39 per FPS
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for €1,035.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 310 minutes ago
19th Variation
FPS
236
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.89/FPS
100%
Price, €
€918.91
112%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €918.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 297 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
4th Variation
19th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
4th Variation
GeForce GTX 1650
4 GB GDDR5 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
32%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
29%
19th Variation
GeForce RTX 3070
8 GB GDDR6 | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
165.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
317.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
4th Variation
Core i7-10700F
2.9 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
1636
70%
Multi-Core
7237
72%
19th Variation
Core i9-11900KF
3.5 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2327
100%
Multi-Core
10019
100%
CPU Winner
Acer Nitro 50 Gaming Desktop PC | vs | STGAubron Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-10700F | CPU | Core i9-11900KF |
| GeForce GTX 1650 | GPU | GeForce RTX 3070 |
32 GB | RAM | 8 GB |
| 512 GB SSD | Storage | N/A Storage |
