Key Differences
In short — Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook outperforms Sager 2024 NP5350D on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both Laptops to compare value.
Advantages of Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook
- Performs up to 9% better in World of Tanks than Sager 2024 NP5350D - 240 vs 220 FPS
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Currently Out of Stock
Out of Stock
Updated 3723 minutes ago
May 1st, 2024
FPS
240
100%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
FPS Winner
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
2nd Variation
May 1st, 2024
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
2nd Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
74%
GPU Winner
May 1st, 2024
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
90%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
2nd Variation
Ryzen 7 8845HS
3.8 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2486
100%
Multi-Core
11671
100%
CPU Winner
May 1st, 2024
Core Ultra 9 185H
2.3 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2401
97%
Multi-Core
11484
98%
Sager 2024 NP5350D Gaming Laptop | vs | Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | May 1st, 2024 |
Ryzen 7 8845HS | CPU | Core Ultra 9 185H |
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile |
96 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
N/A Storage | Storage | 2 TB SSD |
1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
144 Hz | Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
15.6" | Screen Size | 16" |