Key Differences
In short — Razer Blade 16 (2024) outperforms the cheaper NIMO 17.3 FHD IPS on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing NIMO 17.3 FHD IPS is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Razer Blade 16 (2024) Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 136% better in Counter-Strike 2 than NIMO 17.3 FHD IPS - 398 vs 169 FPS
Advantages of NIMO 17.3 FHD IPS Gaming Laptop
- Up to 67% cheaper than Razer Blade 16 (2024) - $719.82 vs $2166.48
- Up to 37% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Razer Blade 16 (2024) - $3.41 vs $5.44 per FPS
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Jan 8th, 2024 • 1st Variation
FPS
398
100%
Value, €/FPS
€5.44/FPS
63%
Price, €
€2166.48
33%
FPS Winner
Buy for €2,166.48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 388 minutes ago
Buy for €719.82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 377 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Jan 8th, 2024 • 1st Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
Jan 8th, 2024 • 1st Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
Radeon 680M
System-Shared | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
70.4 GPixel/s
87%
Texel Fillrate
105.6 GTexel/s
43%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Jan 8th, 2024 • 1st Variation
Core i9-14900HX
2.2 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
2802
100%
Multi-Core
16516
100%
CPU Winner
Razer Blade 16 (2024) Gaming Laptop | vs | NIMO 17.3 FHD IPS Gaming Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-14900HX | CPU | Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H |
| GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile | GPU | Radeon 680M |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
2560x1440 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
240 Hz | Refresh Rate | 60 Hz |
| 16" | Screen Size | 15.6" |
