Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Razer Blade 16 (2024) outperforms the cheaper MSI GF63 Premium on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Razer Blade 16 (2024) Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 4600% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than MSI GF63 Premium - 47 vs 1 FPS
- Up to 93% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than MSI GF63 Premium - $49.53 vs $679.28 per FPS
Advantages of MSI GF63 Premium Gaming Laptop
- Up to 71% cheaper than Razer Blade 16 (2024) - $679.28 vs $2327.83
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Jan 8th, 2024 • 1st Variation
FPS
47
100%
Value, €/FPS
€49.53/FPS
100%
Price, €
€2327.83
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €2,327.83 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 191 minutes ago
Buy for €679.28 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 180 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Jan 8th, 2024 • 1st Variation
2nd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
Jan 8th, 2024 • 1st Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
2nd Variation
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
4 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
48.48 GPixel/s
60%
Texel Fillrate
96.96 GTexel/s
40%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Jan 8th, 2024 • 1st Variation
Core i9-14900HX
2.2 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
2695
100%
Multi-Core
15815
100%
CPU Winner
2nd Variation
Core i5-10300H
2.5 GHz | 4-core
Single-Core
1378
51%
Multi-Core
4034
26%
Razer Blade 16 (2024) Gaming Laptop | vs | MSI GF63 Premium Gaming Laptop |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Unknown |
Core i9-14900HX | CPU | Core i5-10300H |
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile | GPU | GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile |
16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
1 TB SSD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
2560x1440 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
240 Hz | Refresh Rate | 60 Hz |
16" | Screen Size | 15.6" |