Key Differences
In short — Razer Blade 15 Advanced outperforms the cheaper NIMO 17.3 FHD IPS on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing NIMO 17.3 FHD IPS is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Razer Blade 15 Advanced Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 10% better in Counter-Strike 2 than NIMO 17.3 FHD IPS - 186 vs 169 FPS
Advantages of NIMO 17.3 FHD IPS Gaming Laptop
- Up to 39% cheaper than Razer Blade 15 Advanced - $719.82 vs $1187.39
- Up to 33% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Razer Blade 15 Advanced - $4.26 vs $6.38 per FPS
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
May 5th, 2020 • 2nd Variation
FPS
186
100%
Value, €/FPS
€6.38/FPS
67%
Price, €
€1187.39
60%
FPS Winner
Buy for €1,187.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7829 minutes ago
Buy for €719.82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7808 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
May 5th, 2020 • 2nd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
May 5th, 2020 • 2nd Variation
GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Max-Q
8 GB GDDR6 | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
62.4 GPixel/s
89%
Texel Fillrate
187.2 GTexel/s
100%
Radeon 680M
System-Shared | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
70.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
105.6 GTexel/s
56%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
May 5th, 2020 • 2nd Variation
Core i7-10875H
2.3 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
1520
86%
Multi-Core
6574
79%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Gaming Laptop | vs | NIMO 17.3 FHD IPS Gaming Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| May 5th, 2020 | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-10875H | CPU | Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H |
| GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Max-Q | GPU | Radeon 680M |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
3840x2160 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh Rate | 60 Hz |
| 15.6" | Screen Size | 15.6" |
