Key Differences
In short — Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook outperforms Razer Blade 14 (2024) on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both Laptops to compare value. The better performing Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook is 85 days newer than Razer Blade 14 (2024).
Advantages of Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook
- Performs up to 2% better in Rust than Razer Blade 14 (2024) - 113 vs 111 FPS
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
May 1st, 2024
FPS
113
100%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
FPS Winner
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Feb 6th, 2024
May 1st, 2024
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
Feb 6th, 2024
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
100%
May 1st, 2024
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Feb 6th, 2024
Ryzen 9 8945HS
4.0 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2369
99%
Multi-Core
11570
100%
May 1st, 2024
Core Ultra 9 185H
2.3 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2401
100%
Multi-Core
11484
99%
CPU Winner
Razer Blade 14 (2024) Gaming Laptop | vs | Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 6th, 2024 | Release Date | May 1st, 2024 |
| Ryzen 9 8945HS | CPU | Core Ultra 9 185H |
| GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | 2 TB SSD |
2560x1440 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
240 Hz | Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
| 14" | Screen Size | 16" |
