Key Differences
In short — Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook outperforms MSI GP66 11UG-689CA Leopard 15.6" 144Hz on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both Laptops to compare value. The better performing Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook is 651 days newer than MSI GP66 11UG-689CA Leopard 15.6" 144Hz.
Advantages of Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook
- Performs up to 22% better in Deathloop than MSI GP66 11UG-689CA Leopard 15.6" 144Hz - 96 vs 79 FPS
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
May 1st, 2024
FPS
96
100%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
FPS Winner
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Jul 20th, 2022
May 1st, 2024
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
Jul 20th, 2022
GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
124.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
249.6 GTexel/s
100%
May 1st, 2024
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
65%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
98%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Jul 20th, 2022
Core i7-11800H
2.3 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
1900
79%
Multi-Core
7887
69%
May 1st, 2024
Core Ultra 9 185H
2.3 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2401
100%
Multi-Core
11484
100%
CPU Winner
MSI GP66 11UG-689CA Leopard 15.6" 144Hz Gaming Laptop | vs | Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook |
---|---|---|
Jul 20th, 2022 | Release Date | May 1st, 2024 |
Core i7-11800H | CPU | Core Ultra 9 185H |
GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile |
16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
512 GB SSD | Storage | 2 TB SSD |
1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
144 Hz | Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
15.6" | Screen Size | 16" |