Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — MSI GF65 10UE outperforms the cheaper MSI Katana GF76 17 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of MSI GF65 10UE Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 32% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than MSI Katana GF76 17 - 62 vs 47 FPS
- Up to 17% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than MSI Katana GF76 17 - $15.82 vs $19.15 per FPS
Advantages of MSI Katana GF76 17 Gaming Laptop
- Up to 8% cheaper than MSI GF65 10UE - $900.00 vs $981.08
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
FPS
62
100%
Value, €/FPS
€15.82/FPS
100%
Price, €
€981.08
91%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €981.08 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 362951 minutes ago
Buy for €900 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 300 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile
6 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
68.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
171 GTexel/s
100%
3rd Variation
GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
4 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
42.28 GPixel/s
62%
Texel Fillrate
67.65 GTexel/s
40%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
3rd Variation
Core i7-11800H
2.3 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
1901
100%
Multi-Core
7821
100%
CPU Winner
MSI GF65 10UE Gaming Laptop | vs | MSI Katana GF76 17 Gaming Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i5-10500 | CPU | Core i7-11800H |
| GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile |
24 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
| 144 Hz | Refresh Rate | 144 Hz |
| 15.6" | Screen Size | 17.3" |
