The M C S Surface is at least 2x slower gaming Laptop than the ASUS TUF A16. We cannot compare value as at least one Laptop is out of stock.
Advantages of the M C S Surface Laptop
The ASUS TUF Gaming A16 Laptop is better in every way
Advantages of the ASUS TUF Gaming A16 Laptop
- At least 2x faster Laptop for gaming
M C S Surface vs ASUS TUF A16 for Gaming
The Laptop's performance in selected game and settings
M C S Surface Laptop
$2,701.80
Average FPS
44
46%
Min 1% FPS
19
36%
Price, €
€2701.8
100%
Value, €/FPS
€61.4/FPS
100%
ASUS TUF Gaming A16 Laptop
Average FPS
96
100%
Min 1% FPS
53
100%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
M C S Surface Laptop
$2,701.80
GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
4 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
42.28 GPixel/s
47%
Texture Fillrate
67.65 GTexel/s
37%
FP32
0%
ASUS TUF Gaming A16 Laptop
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
11.61 TFLOPS
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 6 benchmark scores
M C S Surface Laptop
$2,701.80
Core i7-11370H
3.3 GHz | 4-core
Geekbench 6 Single-Core
1771
72%
Geekbench 6 Multi-Core
5520
48%
ASUS TUF Gaming A16 Laptop
Ryzen 9 7940HS
4.0 GHz | 8-core
Geekbench 6 Single-Core
2456
100%
Geekbench 6 Multi-Core
11557
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
M C S Surface Laptop | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | ASUS TUF Gaming A16 Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| – | Release Date | – |
| Core i7-11370H | CPU | Ryzen 9 7940HS |
| GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 1 TB | SSD | 2 TB |
| – | HDD | – |
| Screen | ||
| 1920 x 1080 | Resolution | 2560 x 1440 |
| 120 Hz | Refresh Rate | 240 Hz |
| 14.4" | Screen Size | 16" |
