Key Differences
In short — Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook outperforms HP Victus 16 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both Laptops to compare value.
Advantages of Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook
- Performs up to 10% better in Elden Ring than HP Victus 16 - 85 vs 77 FPS
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
13th Variation
FPS
77
91%
Value, €/FPS
€15.78/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1215.32
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €1,215.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4673 minutes ago
May 1st, 2024
FPS
85
100%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
FPS Winner
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
13th Variation
May 1st, 2024
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
13th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
74%
May 1st, 2024
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
90%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
13th Variation
Ryzen 7 7840HS
3.8 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2388
99%
Multi-Core
11190
97%
May 1st, 2024
Core Ultra 9 185H
2.3 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2401
100%
Multi-Core
11484
100%
HP Victus 16 Gaming Laptop | vs | Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | May 1st, 2024 |
| Ryzen 7 7840HS | CPU | Core Ultra 9 185H |
| GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 2 TB SSD | Storage | 2 TB SSD |
2560x1440 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
240 Hz | Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
| 16.1" | Screen Size | 16" |
