Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — HP Victus 16 outperforms the cheaper NIMO 17.3 FHD IPS on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of HP Victus 16 Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 122% better in Sea of Thieves than NIMO 17.3 FHD IPS - 149 vs 67 FPS
- Up to 25% better value when playing Sea of Thieves than NIMO 17.3 FHD IPS - $8.04 vs $10.74 per FPS
Advantages of NIMO 17.3 FHD IPS Gaming Laptop
- Up to 40% cheaper than HP Victus 16 - $719.82 vs $1198.19
Sea of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
12th Variation
FPS
149
100%
Value, €/FPS
€8.04/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1198.19
60%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,198.19 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7281 minutes ago
Buy for €719.82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7273 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
12th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
Radeon 680M
System-Shared | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
70.4 GPixel/s
78%
Texel Fillrate
105.6 GTexel/s
58%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
12th Variation
Ryzen 7 7840HS
3.8 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2388
100%
Multi-Core
11190
100%
CPU Winner
HP Victus 16 Gaming Laptop | vs | NIMO 17.3 FHD IPS Gaming Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 7 7840HS | CPU | Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H |
| GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile | GPU | Radeon 680M |
64 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 2 TB SSD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
2560x1440 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
240 Hz | Refresh Rate | 60 Hz |
| 16.1" | Screen Size | 15.6" |
