Key Differences
In short — HP Omen-17-CK2095CL outperforms the cheaper Acer Predator Triton 300 SE 14-inch WUXGA 165Hz, 512GB SSD, i7-12700H on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Acer Predator Triton 300 SE 14-inch WUXGA 165Hz, 512GB SSD, i7-12700H is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of HP Omen-17-CK2095CL Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 38% better in World of Warcraft than Acer Predator Triton 300 SE 14-inch WUXGA 165Hz, 512GB SSD, i7-12700H - 210 vs 152 FPS
Advantages of Acer Predator Triton 300 SE 14-inch WUXGA 165Hz, 512GB SSD, i7-12700H Gaming Laptop
- Up to 76% cheaper than HP Omen-17-CK2095CL - $796.40 vs $3323.42
- Up to 67% better value when playing World of Warcraft than HP Omen-17-CK2095CL - $5.24 vs $15.83 per FPS
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for €3,323.42 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 300 minutes ago
FPS
152
72%
Value, €/FPS
€5.24/FPS
100%
Price, €
€796.4
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €796.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 323 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile
12 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
133.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
386.3 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile
6 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
68.4 GPixel/s
51%
Texel Fillrate
171 GTexel/s
44%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
HP Omen-17-CK2095CL Gaming Laptop | vs | Acer Predator Triton 300 SE 14-inch WUXGA 165Hz, 512GB SSD, i7-12700H Gaming Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-13900 | CPU | Core i7-12700 |
| GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile |
64 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 8 TB SSD | Storage | 512 GB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
| 165 Hz | Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
| 17.3" | Screen Size | 14" |
