Key Differences
In short — Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook outperforms HP Omen 16 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both Laptops to compare value.
Advantages of Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook
- Performs up to 6% better in No Man's Sky than HP Omen 16 - 136 vs 128 FPS
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
45th Variation
FPS
128
94%
Value, €/FPS
€16.46/FPS
100%
Price, €
€2107.21
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €2,107.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 338 minutes ago
May 1st, 2024
FPS
136
100%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
FPS Winner
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
45th Variation
May 1st, 2024
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
45th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
74%
GPU Winner
May 1st, 2024
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
90%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
45th Variation
Core i7-14650HX
2.2 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2530
100%
Multi-Core
14291
100%
CPU Winner
May 1st, 2024
Core Ultra 9 185H
2.3 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2401
95%
Multi-Core
11484
80%
HP Omen 16 Gaming Laptop | vs | Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | May 1st, 2024 |
| Core i7-14650HX | CPU | Core Ultra 9 185H |
| GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile |
64 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 8 TB SSD | Storage | 2 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
| 144 Hz | Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
| 16.4" | Screen Size | 16" |
