Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Asus TUF A16 outperforms the more expensive HP OMEN 16 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Asus TUF Gaming A16 Laptop
- Performs up to 4% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than HP OMEN 16 - 87 vs 84 FPS
- Up to 41% cheaper than HP OMEN 16 - $837.83 vs $1422.69
- Up to 43% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than HP OMEN 16 - $9.63 vs $16.94 per FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for €1,422.69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 266 minutes ago
11th Variation
FPS
87
100%
Value, €/FPS
€9.63/FPS
100%
Price, €
€837.83
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €837.83 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 254 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
13th Variation
11th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
13th Variation
GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile
6 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
68.4 GPixel/s
75%
Texel Fillrate
171 GTexel/s
94%
GPU Winner
11th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
13th Variation
Core i9-12900
2.4 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2473
100%
Multi-Core
13044
100%
CPU Winner
11th Variation
Ryzen 7 7735HS
3.2 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
1964
79%
Multi-Core
9281
71%
HP OMEN 16 Gaming Laptop | vs | Asus TUF Gaming A16 Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-12900 | CPU | Ryzen 7 7735HS |
| GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile |
| 16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
2560x1440 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
| 165 Hz | Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
| 16.1" | Screen Size | 16" |
