Key Differences
In short — GIGABYTE AORUS 17H: 17.3" Thin Bezel FHD1920x1080 360Hz Display, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 outperforms Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both Laptops to compare value. The better performing GIGABYTE AORUS 17H: 17.3" Thin Bezel FHD1920x1080 360Hz Display, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 is 448 days older than Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook.
Advantages of GIGABYTE AORUS 17H: 17.3" Thin Bezel FHD1920x1080 360Hz Display, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop
- Performs up to 40% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook - 221 vs 158 FPS
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FPS
221
100%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
FPS Winner
Currently Out of Stock
Out of Stock
Updated 4441 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
May 1st, 2024
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile
12 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
133.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
386.3 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
May 1st, 2024
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
61%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
63%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
May 1st, 2024
Core Ultra 9 185H
2.3 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2401
91%
Multi-Core
11484
78%
GIGABYTE AORUS 17H: 17.3" Thin Bezel FHD1920x1080 360Hz Display, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop | vs | Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 8th, 2023 | Release Date | May 1st, 2024 |
| Core i7-13700 | CPU | Core Ultra 9 185H |
| GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | 2 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
360 Hz | Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
| 17.3" | Screen Size | 16" |
