Key Differences
In short — GIGABYTE AORUS 16X outperforms Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 (PTN16-51-978P) on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both Laptops to compare value. The better performing GIGABYTE AORUS 16X is 37 days newer than Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 (PTN16-51-978P).
Advantages of GIGABYTE AORUS 16X Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 7% better in World of Tanks than Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 (PTN16-51-978P) - 256 vs 240 FPS
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FPS
240
94%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Feb 28th, 2024
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
Feb 28th, 2024
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Feb 28th, 2024
Core i9-14900HX
2.2 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
2802
100%
Multi-Core
16516
100%
CPU Winner
GIGABYTE AORUS 16X Gaming Laptop | vs | Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 (PTN16-51-978P) Gaming Laptop |
|---|---|---|
Feb 28th, 2024 | Release Date | Jan 22nd, 2024 |
| Core i9-14900HX | CPU | Core Ultra 9 185H |
| GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
| 165 Hz | Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
| 16" | Screen Size | 16" |
