Key Differences
In short — Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook outperforms GIGABYTE AORUS 15 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both Laptops to compare value. The better performing Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook is 173 days newer than GIGABYTE AORUS 15.
Advantages of Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook
- Performs up to 2% better in Battlefield IV than GIGABYTE AORUS 15 - 236 vs 231 FPS
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
May 1st, 2024
FPS
236
100%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
FPS Winner
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Nov 10th, 2023 • 4th Variation
May 1st, 2024
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
Nov 10th, 2023 • 4th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
74%
GPU Winner
May 1st, 2024
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
90%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Nov 10th, 2023 • 4th Variation
Core i7-13700
2.1 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2632
100%
Multi-Core
14759
100%
CPU Winner
May 1st, 2024
Core Ultra 9 185H
2.3 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2401
91%
Multi-Core
11484
78%
GIGABYTE AORUS 15 Gaming Laptop | vs | Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 10th, 2023 | Release Date | May 1st, 2024 |
| Core i7-13700 | CPU | Core Ultra 9 185H |
| GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | 2 TB SSD |
2560x1440 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
| 165 Hz | Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
| 15.6" | Screen Size | 16" |
