Key Differences
In short — GIGABYTE AORUS 15 outperforms Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both Laptops to compare value. The better performing GIGABYTE AORUS 15 is 412 days older than Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook.
Advantages of GIGABYTE AORUS 15 Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 1% better in F1 22 than Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook - 149 vs 148 FPS
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Mar 16th, 2023 • 3rd Variation
FPS
149
100%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
FPS Winner
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Mar 16th, 2023 • 3rd Variation
May 1st, 2024
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
Mar 16th, 2023 • 3rd Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
May 1st, 2024
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Mar 16th, 2023 • 3rd Variation
Core i7-13700
2.1 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2632
100%
Multi-Core
14759
100%
CPU Winner
May 1st, 2024
Core Ultra 9 185H
2.3 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2401
91%
Multi-Core
11484
78%
GIGABYTE AORUS 15 Gaming Laptop | vs | Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2023 | Release Date | May 1st, 2024 |
Core i7-13700 | CPU | Core Ultra 9 185H |
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile |
16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
N/A Storage | Storage | 2 TB SSD |
2560x1440 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
165 Hz | Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
15.6" | Screen Size | 16" |